FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
The testimony of the mayor of Himara, Jorgo Goro, who was arrested under the charge of alienation of property, according to which he was justified by saying that he acted to resolve disputes, has been disclosed.
He states that he only gave an opinion on where the property of citizen Haris Runa and Krenar Adili could be, in order to resolve the conflict.
"Questioned in the capacity of the person who has knowledge of the criminal offense, the citizen Jorgo Goro explains, among other things, that: in relation to the request no. 19555 dated 07.09.2016, from the Local Real Estate Registration Office Vlorë, the Directorate of Land Protection and Management has performed its actions of which he is not aware, but simply signed the return response as the owner of the institution addressed to ZVRPP. Vlora, after compilation by the relevant directorate.
So all the procedure followed for the case in question was handled by the relevant directorate which carried out the relevant verifications, and the Himarë Municipality responded with letter no. 2751/1 dated 13.09.2016.
Asked what legal basis served for him as mayor, to outline the property with number 36/35, the declarant answered that he intervened to resolve disputes between citizens. This competence, according to the declarant, is foreseen in the law of local self-government and specifically in article 29 point 3 of the law no. 139 of 2015, amended by law no. 38/2019, dated 20.06.2019, which stipulates that in the field of public security, municipalities are responsible for guaranteeing community relations, prevention and mediation to resolve community conflicts. Asked about letter no. 2751/1 dated 13.09.2016, from the Municipality of Himarë, addressed to the Local Property Registration Office of Vlora, where it is stated that in ZK 1739-Gjilek the process of the first systematic initial registration (management) has not been carried out and that they (the municipality) do not have maps registration indicators (HTR), thus not being able to express the jurisdiction and location of the properties, while below the opinion is expressed that there is an overlap and that the properties of Haris Runa and Krenar Adili are located in the area outlined by no. 36/35, citizen Jorgo Goro replied that he only gave an opinion on where the property of citizens Haris Runa and Krenar Adili could be, in order to resolve the conflict. Asked where he started to give an opinion on the number identification of the property of citizens Haris Runa and Krenar Adili, the declarant states that the request with no. 19555 prot., dated 07.09.2016 of ZRPP Vlorë does not provide an opinion on the contouring of the property of citizens Haris Runa and Krenar Adili, so they as an institution have gone further in their answer when they have given an opinion that the properties of these citizens are contoured in the property with no. 36/35", the file states.
Lini një Përgjigje