FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Trump's promise to end the war in Ukraine is not just rhetoric. According to former US Army officer David T. Pyne, current deputy director of the National and Homeland Security Task Force and author of numerous defense-related newspapers and magazines, US President Joe Biden hid for months from the American public. and the real danger of a nuclear war with Russia. In an interview for "Inside Over" he showed how Donald Trump can end the conflict if he is elected president in November.
-Dear Pyne, You wrote a long article on Substack on March 23, in which you talk about the possible involvement of Western and Ukrainian secret services in the terrorist attack in Moscow. A rather controversial thesis: more than two weeks after the massacre, what is your opinion of what happened?
I continue to believe that the circumstantial evidence shows that the terrorist attack on the Moscow concert hall was a Ukrainian intelligence operation. The only question I have is whether this attack was supported by US intelligence. My assessment is that it probably wasn't, but the fact that the Ukrainian intelligence services that organized the attack are funded and supported by the United States implicates the latter as well.
-But why do you think the hypothesis that it was the work of ISIS-K is not reliable? Moscow accuses Vasyl Malyuk, head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU). Do you agree?
The question is not whether ISIS-K fighters carried out the attack, but who recruited and paid them to carry out this terrorist attack. I believe that ISIS-K has little or no motivation to carry out such an attack, while Ukraine has a pattern and practice of attacking civilians, although not on this scale. This is definitely a cover up. Minutes after the attack, the Biden administration rushed to tell the world that Ukraine was not responsible. How could they know without investigating whether that statement was true or not. It is clear that this is an attempt to hide Ukraine's involvement in the attack.
-You wrote that US intelligence estimated the risk of Russian nuclear escalation at 50% in September 2022, but Biden tried to hide the risk. Is there really a risk of nuclear conflict?
Yes, there has been a widespread risk of nuclear conflict over the past two years due to NATO's war in Ukraine. Ukrainian attacks on Russian nuclear bases by bombers and submarines may have already crossed Russia's nuclear demarcation line, meaning Russian tactical nuclear escalation could occur with little warning. Russian political and military leaders have long believed that a nuclear war could be fought and won by the side best prepared to deal with it, and have built thousands of nuclear weapons that could be used to help them defeat Ukraine and NATO- n. However, Russia will likely, before going nuclear, disable all Western satellites that help Ukraine fight against it and engage in massive cyber attacks against Ukraine and NATO countries.
-Kiev seems to be fighting on the battlefield. How long can he last without US help?
Ukraine has already been defeated by Russia, but Zelensky and his Western backers have refused to accept defeat. Further US military assistance would only prolong this unwinnable war and greatly increase the cost in terms of human lives, destroyed cities and lost territory to Ukraine. The only hope I see for ending the war is to suspend all US aid to Ukraine until Zelensky accepts and implements a ceasefire with Russia. Without further US help, Zelensky is likely to be forced to make peace with Russia by late summer or early fall. How long Ukraine can hold out depends largely on whether Russia opts for a spring/summer offensive to seize much of eastern Ukraine and threaten Kiev again. Ukrainian forces already lack air defense and heavy artillery.
- Could the possible election of Donald Trump in November end the war in Ukraine?
Yes, Trump is absolutely committed to negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine immediately after being sworn in as President. His promise to end the war is not mere rhetoric. It would be his top foreign policy priority from day one of his presidency. He would tell Zelenskiy that he cannot expect further aid from the United States until he agrees to a permanent cease-fire and cease-fire with Russia. President Trump campaigned on promoting world peace and preventing the United States from getting stuck in a third world war that would inevitably escalate to the nuclear level, and I have every reason to believe that he is very sincere in that. engagement. President Biden, instead, brought the United States and its allies to the brink of the nuclear abyss with Russia and China with no US or NATO security interests at stake in Ukraine's ongoing border dispute with Russia. . Contrary to the propaganda of the Biden regime, the war in Ukraine did not start because Putin wanted to restore the old Russian empire, but rather because the United States continued to try to expand its liberal empire in Ukraine and across Russia's western border. As John Mearsheimer has noted, Russia responded exactly as the United States would have responded under similar circumstances, acting to eliminate this existential threat to its security.
-What do you think about the actions of the Biden administration in Gaza?
I think the Biden administration's performance in the Gaza war was bad, though not to the level of the Ukraine war. In Gaza he has at least called for a cease-fire, while in Ukraine he has vehemently opposed all calls for a cease-fire in an effort to continue using hundreds of thousands more Ukrainian soldiers as cannon fodder in his efforts to fight an endless and unwinnable war to weaken Russia militarily. Biden's problem in Gaza is that he has essentially given Israel a blank check to fight on indefinitely. The only way to get Israel to agree to a permanent cease-fire is to condition further US aid on Israel stopping the war, but he does not have the guts to do that. / Adapted "Pamphlet" from "Inside Over"
Lini një Përgjigje