FLASH
Shkruar nga Lutfi Dervishi
Police communications, instead of being a tool of transparency, often, and especially when the police themselves are involved, become shields that erase any trace of responsibility.
The recent incident with the police involving Mr. Adriatik Alimadhi, former MP and leader of a political party, is not just an ordinary incident.
Alimadhi's public confession is shocking, both in terms of content and the extent of the violence and attempts to manipulate the event it describes.
What makes the situation even more worrying is the stark contrast between personal testimony and the official State Police statement.
According to the statement, Alimadhi is a "bad guy" who opposes the police.
In the public announcement there is not a word about the use of force. Nor about insults. Nor about security cameras. The question in this case remains: who writes the official truth and on what basis?
Police communications, instead of being a tool for transparency, often and especially when the police themselves are involved, become shields that erase any trace of responsibility. Who drafts them is never investigated. The authors of the distortion of facts, the authors who hurt with untruths more than police violence, are never questioned.
A strong state is measured by respect for its citizens at the moment when they are most vulnerable.
If police violence exists, it should be punished. If the allegations are false, then it should be investigated for defamation. But what cannot continue is two completely opposite stories about one event.
Considering what the press releases have said in previous events, I believe 100% what citizen Alimadhi says!
Cameras don't lie.
And to prevent further manipulation, those who exercise violence should not be investigated in the first place, but those who lie and misinform the public.
Lini një Përgjigje