FLASH
Shkruar nga Andi Bushati
Perhaps it's worth listing these "arguments" to discern the hidden agenda behind them.
At the post-victory rally in Skanderbeg Square, Edi Rama issued an order, which, since that day, has become the refrain of all television studios, of what the fake oppositionists, who have found a form of survival in this regime, repeat; of what the supposedly independents, who still have some kind of semblance left, say; or the useful idiots who are too lazy to put their brains to work.
In that speech, the Prime Minister said that this people have decided “not to change the government without first changing the opposition” of this country. Since that moment, the “deconstruction” of this directive has appeared in public in various ways. So perhaps it is worth sorting out these “arguments” to discern the hidden agenda behind them.
1- Alibia: "Rama did not win, Berisha lost"
Supporters of the idea that we had normal elections are caught like a drowning man by a straw to say that the people did not elect Rama, but condemned Berisha. They mention it with pathos and use every argument to prove this thesis. But they "forget" that after 12 years in power and the discovery of half a dozen thieves in the government, Rama received more votes than ever in history (a full 856 thousand) that he had won neither in 2009, nor in 2013, nor in 2017 nor in 2021. So Rama's victory does not come only as a result of the opposition's disintegration, but also for the simple fact that with his methods, he achieved a record number of votes in favor of the SP.
2-The alibi of a weak DP
Another argument is that of a weak, disorganized DP that lost voters, which produced the electoral surge of the opponent. Yes, at first glance, these are true, but it is important to understand that the prime minister was not entirely responsible for creating these symptoms, and was even personally involved in their inflammation. It is now a fact, even according to the statements of the new American administration, that the declaration of Berisha as Non Grata was a lobbied act. Likewise, fighting it with McGonigal-style methods is no longer in doubt.
If we do not forget that these sponsored attacks coming from abroad also caused the new justice system to keep the DP for almost half of its mandate without a seal, without finances and without legal recognition, because its leader was isolated for a year without being able to exercise his normal activity, it is easier to understand why the DP shrank. After all, it was not competing with a rival party but with an entire state.
So the argument that the DP was weak cannot be seen outside the project of leveling the playing field for all.
3- The "little ones'" alibi
Mbrojtësit e zgjedhjeve normale flasin për fajin e Berishës, që bashkë me Ramën, ka kurdisur një sistem zgjedhor që nuk favorizon partitë e vogla. Po, është e vërtetë, që të dy sëbashku votuan në 2008 një sistem të padrejtë që penalizon forcat e reja dhe i transferon votat e tyre tek dy të mëdhenjtë. Por fakti se “i vogli ushqeu të madhin”, nuk mund të arsyetojë gjithçka.
Krahas fajit të një Saliu të pandreqshëm nuk duhet të harrojmë se partitë e vogla nuk u penalizuan vetëm nga kjo. Ato së bashku qenë gjithashtu viktima të një gare të pabarabartë, të përcaktuar nga kamikazllëku i administratës politike, nga patronazhistët që përdornin vjedhjen e të dhënave personale nga banditët lokalë që prodhuan fenomene si Sara Mila e Arkend Balla.
4- Alibia me relativizimin e bandave
Personazhet e mësipërme janë simbole të votës të grumbulluar nga pakti i pushtetit me bandat. Por, po ti shohësh ramistët e maskuar, sa herë që fjala shkon tek Troplinët, Suel Çela, apo Bajrat, ata i shmangen debatit sikur kjo të jetë një tabu. Me siguri që më tepër se frika nga personazhet e mësipërme i tremb ideja e rrëshqitjes në një terren ku s’ka asnjë mundësi që teza e zgjedhjeve normale të dalë e fituar.
5- Alibia e vjedhjes për hobi
Po të njëjtët reken të argumentojnë se parregullësi, shantazh, blerje të votës mund të ketë pasur. Por menjëherë pas kësaj shtojnë se kjo nuk ka ndikuar në rezultat. Por duke thënë këtë asnjëherë nuk shtrojnë dilemën që rrjedh natyrshëm: “çi duhet të vjedhë dikujt që s’ka nevojë ta bëjë”.
6- Alibia e zhdukjes së partisë së Metës
Shumica e atyre që gjejnë tkurrjen e votës opozitare, si pretekst kryesor për të justifikuar këto votime, bëjnë sikur harrojnë një gjë. Në këtë thes mungojnë 100 e ca mijë votat që LSI-a kishte në 2021 që ishin dy fish më shumë në 2017.
Por ky asgjesim nuk u arrit vetëm me blerjet masive që Rama bëri në radhët e hierarkëve të kësaj partie, që tashmë janë dëshmuar edhe me video të neveritshme. Ajo lidhet edhe me ultimatumet që kryeministri i bëri SPAK-ut nga kongresi i PS-së: “durimi ynë për prangosjen e Metës po soset”. Dhe atë që nuk e bënë dot socialistët duke prodhuar edhe ligje absurde kundër “spiunëve”, e bëri SPAK-u duke burgosur liderin e partisë së dytë opozitare.
Pra kur analizojmë reduktimin e votave opozitare nuk kemi se si të harrojmë edhe drejtësinë e re, që ka punuar sinkron me PS-ë.
7- Alibia e dashurisë për një palë hajdutë
Kripto ramistët lodhen duke analizuar se shqiptarët nuk janë aq budallej sa të votojnë më për një parti si e Ilirit apo Monikës, e cila u zhduk nga harta politike e vendit, pasi SPAK po i heton si të korruptuar.
But, they forget to use the same weight and the same measure in judging all the factors in the game. Otherwise, how can it be explained that the attacks of Duman's guys on Veliaj, Beqaj, Ahmetaj, Koka, Tahiri had no impact on the vote for the SP? The alibi that the electorate despises the 'thieves' of one party and loves those of the other is unacceptable even for a minimal logic.
8- Theft within the species alibi
The standard-bearers of the defense of a normal process are forced to admit with a half-hearted voice that sometimes even completely anonymous ministers managed to defeat, on the open list, SP figures such as former prime ministers.
But, they stop only at the conclusion of this paradox because they dare not claim that this criminal-administrative machinery that stole votes within the same category, once put into operation, could not but have been used as a weapon against opposition rivals.
9- Alibia: La Civita was to blame
Members of the same category say with their mouths full that people could no longer chew on the tales of lobbyists who wanted to lie to them about MAGA in La Civita or the possibility of removing Non Grata. Maybe they are right.
But the same people who use this reasoning to attack the opposition's election results consider it normal what Rama did with McGonigal, Trump's son-in-law in Sazan, or the sale of the country's sovereignty to Meloni. Their contradiction is that lobbying for one works while it boomerangs for another.
10- The permanent alibi: "Saliu was, is and will be guilty"
So in short, it is easy to spot a camouflaged Ramist because he will find a more sophisticated form to repeat the refrain that his spiritual leader has been singing for a decade and a half to justify everything: "Saliu is to blame."
Lini një Përgjigje