FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Today, the Council of Mandates met in the Presidency of the Assembly, to discuss the SPAK request for the arrest of Sali Berisha for the "Partizani" file.
Enkelejd Alibeaj, during his speech, addressed a question to the SPAK prosecutor, Arben Kraja, about what measure will be required against former Prime Minister Berisha in Court.
The region has not agreed to answer concretely, while saying that it will be a decision of two prosecutors.
Alibeaj: The hypothesis is based on the fact of violation of the obligations of the preventive measures. Certain measures are imposed on someone, he does not respect them. Article 216 has two hypotheses, when the insurance needs are aggravated and non-compliance with a previous measure, I would like to know how the hypothesis is the violation of the obligations of certain measures, or has there also been a serious increase in the insurance needs?
End: Those are the provisions, we stick to the first one, the person under investigation Sali Berisha has not repeatedly implemented the court's decision on the obligation to appear.
Alibeaj: There is a claim that the obligations, according to the prohibitive measures, are entrusted due to the fact that according to the lawyers and the deputy in question, we would have to come to the parliament as SPAK to be the imposition of measures is legal and legitimate, but so are the obligations. For you, I wanted to know the opinion of SPAK, how do you consider them. Do you consider that the request for preventive measures in addition to house arrest and prison, should the others go through the parliamentary procedure?
Country: We acted in accordance with the constitution and the criminal code. We submitted a request, we are convinced that we are right and we stand by it until the end. We will refer to the conditions of the procedure. When a deputy is requested to be arrested in prison or at home, the prosecutor requests authorization. What does deprivation of liberty mean? Restriction and removal are two opposites. In case of removal, the prosecutor must come to you, article 232 one of the measures is admission to a psychiatric hospital, it means total removal of freedom, the prosecutor must come to the assembly. All the debate takes place after the changes in the constitution in 2015, to what extent the prosecution has the right to investigate a member of parliament, they were all removed and the arrest in prison, in the ship and checks remained. There is no obstacle for the prosecution to investigate a member of parliament, the law allows it. Now let's see what the constitutional court says.
Lini një Përgjigje