FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Journalist Klodiana Lala and analyst Andi Bushati clashed tonight in the studio of the show "Te Paespozuarit" on MCN TV after the transcripts of the conversations about buying votes in Himare, which are in the prosecution's claim, were broadcast.
Bushati considered the transcripts to be manipulated, while Klodiana Lala said that he has never been to the court where all the sessions for Beleri were held and he does not know the process.
Part of the debate
Andi Bushati: As a journalist, I don't believe either Beler or the prosecution, without seeing the evidence myself.
Klodiana Lala: Bushat, what is your claim on this matter?
Andi Bushati-Ylli Rakipit: Do you believe the claim? That I doubt.
Ylli Rakipi : This is the prosecution's claim.
Andi Bushati: I don't believe it.
Klodiana Lala: Bushat, look me in the eyes. Thanks for following me. First and I really appreciate this piece. Secondly..
Andi Bushati: I saw that there was a lot of dialogue with Fevziu, one threw it, the other cut it.
Klodiana Lala: You cannot take it out of context, because it is dishonest on your part. Tell that to someone else.
Andi Bushati: I told you, I set my position. I am "paid" by Greece, I receive medicine, I receive pensions...
Klodiana Lala: I've been going all this time and I haven't seen you in this process and I don't know where you get the data from. That I have seen that this issue is being talked about, and maybe I have been cursed, but I haven't seen you, maybe you were there, but I haven't seen you. To clarify that Mr. Fevziu also asked me about this issue. The audio recordings are in the investigation file, but have not been heard, because the lawyers of Mr. Beller three times by the presiding judge if they had allegations about the content of the audio conversations and they did not raise any allegations regarding these conversations and there were no allegations about the content of the conversations, the procedures provide that the conversations are heard only when there are allegations of manipulation , that the transcription was not done correctly, that the voice in the audio is not the person who is claimed, but someone else. They had only one claim, that these interceptions should not be taken into consideration by the court, because in our view, they were not taken in accordance with the procedure. So they did not say that they are not true.
Lini një Përgjigje