FLASH
Shkruar nga Mero Baze
Two measures against Balluk cannot be applied simultaneously, both the first measure, that of suspension, and the second proposal, which is the request for lifting immunity from arrest.
The remaining in force of Belinda Balluku's suspension as minister after the Constitutional Court's failure to make a decision makes meaningless the second security measure that SPAK has proposed to the GJKKO, to obtain authorization to lift Ms. Balluku's immunity.
The second measure proposed by SPAK came after the government's resistance to accepting the suspension measure as legal and taking it to the Constitutional Court for trial.
Now the failure of the Constitutional Court, in addition to leaving the government without an answer, practically leaves in force the first measure of SPAK, that of suspending it from office.
Given that Balluku is currently suspended, the majority should terminate the parliamentary procedures for lifting immunity, as SPAK's first proposal, that of suspension, remains in force. She is no longer a minister as of Friday, and as such, the argument that she is influencing the investigations falls apart.
SPAK's second request under these conditions becomes unnecessary and, since it is in procedure in the Assembly, can be terminated.
SPAK argued the request in the GJKKO with the fact that Balluku and the government resisted the request for suspension by taking it to the Constitutional Court. Now this issue has been exhausted and SPAK's haste to request a new measure is unnecessary.
Otherwise, all the noise that the Constitutional Court's decision hits Balluku loses its meaning. The fact that everyone is saying that Ms. Balluku lost the trial at the Constitutional Court means that SPAK has earned its right to suspend her.
Practically, Belinda Balluku is no longer a minister and SPAK's initial request has been implemented. The government's battle to force the Constitutional Court to express its opinion on the legality of this request was defeated due to the quorum and the tie of votes. Now, when the Court is completed with nine members, the government can repeat the request without linking it to the case in question, but taking the cause of the lack of a response, which is important for the future of the interaction of the judicial and political powers.
For Ms. Balluku, the failure to respond leaves the first measure of SPAK in force. Now, two measures cannot be applied simultaneously against Balluku, both the first measure, that of suspension, and the second proposal, which is the request for lifting immunity for arrest. Otherwise, it will be the case that SPAK ignores the Constitutional Court's decision to suspend and has lost the argument why it requested the replacement of the security measure.
Mero ka avancuar ceshtja or buf! Nga masa e pare ka kaluar ne kerkese per mase tjeter sepse e pandehura ka vazhduar te minoje procesin kunder saj me intimidim deshmitaresh e tentative per prishje provash! Si do ja beni tani qe fasada ra e hajt te shkruajme brockulla juridike impotentesh o qeros!