FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Analyst Andi Bushati commented on the Balluku file, for which he said that SPAK has also affected Edi Rama for the first time.
According to the journalist, what emerges from the file is that all roads lead to Edi Rama.
Bushati states that SPAK does not show where the money Rama took from the bag ended up.
" If there is a file that seems to affect the prime minister, it can be said that this is the first one that affects Rama. We take the incinerator, there is no trace of Rama. We take Veliaj, Ahmetaj, there is none. The Llogara tunnel, is something that I don't believe there is anyone, anyone who knows the affairs of the state, who wouldn't say that Rama is here."
From the bag, Rama has taken 190 million euros and given it to someone else. Logic dictates that here Balluku has played Rama's trick. We have often criticized SPAK, which does not touch the procedure, does not touch the essence of how something was given. If we had criticism about the file, we could do so.
It is the first time in a SPAK file that we show how a senior official was involved in every step and stage of the manipulation of a tender. Veliaj is called the wife's dresses, Ahmetaj is called the ex-wife's plates.
I also disagree with the publication of the files, because SPAK kills you publicly, then goes to court.
What is the strong and weak point of the file? With Veliaj we know that he won, a villa, so much money, etc., here he does not tell us where the money went. If with Veliaj, he does not tell us the role of Veliaj in giving this permission, doing this favor, he has zero role, in this case Balluku is involved in every criminal part of the ring of manipulation of a tender.
This is the positive side. But in the end, the negative side, where did the money go? We don't have that ," Bushati said.
Lini një Përgjigje