FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
In the past two years, human rights organizations have reported increased settler violence and restrictions on Palestinian access to their lands and properties...
The Israeli government this week approved a plan to register lands in the occupied West Bank as "state land," a decision that has sparked backlash and accusations of deepening Israeli control over Palestinian territory.
The proposal was supported by right-wing ministers, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Justice Minister Yariv Levin and Defense Minister Israel Katz. Under the decision, the government will create 35 new positions and allocate 244.1 million shekels (about $79 million) for the land registration project in the period 2026–2030.
The land registration process had been frozen since 1967. Its resumption is interpreted by critics as a continuation of a long-term policy of consolidating Israeli control over the territory. Israeli authorities have not announced any suspension of other land administration practices during this period.
For Palestinians and organizations opposing the plan, the decision does not constitute a new development, but a strengthening of the Israeli presence in the West Bank. According to them, land registration is not just a technical procedure, but a step with long-term legal consequences.
From Oslo to Zone C
The measure is directly related to the administrative division established by the Oslo Accords (1993–1995), which divided the West Bank into Areas A, B, and C. Area C, which constitutes over 62 percent of the territory and includes most of the natural resources, remained under full Israeli control, while Areas A and B are administered partially or mainly by the Palestinian Authority.
Under the new plan, land registration in Area C would be carried out through the Land Titles Settlement Administration, part of Israel's Justice Ministry. Critics argue that the move shifts administration from a military framework to direct Israeli civilian government, institutionalizing control.
On February 8, a week before the plan was approved, Israeli authorities also approved measures that eased procedures for land purchases by settlers, reducing oversight. On the same day, steps were taken that, according to opponents of the policy, further limit the powers of the Palestinian Authority in Areas A and B.
According to critical analyses, these measures represent a new phase of territorial expansion through administrative instruments, rather than through overt military actions.
Registration and legal consequences
Registering land as “state land” creates lasting legal consequences. Once a parcel is included in the Israeli state registry, overturning its status becomes more difficult compared to temporary military seizures.
Opponents of the plan compare this process to previous practices, including the use of the Missing Property Law after 1948, when the land of Palestinians who were not physically on their properties was appropriated by the Israeli state. They warn of a similar dynamic in the West Bank, where displacements, access restrictions and the declaration of closed military zones could affect the status of property.
In the past two years, human rights organizations have reported increased settler violence and restrictions on Palestinian access to their lands and properties. According to these reports, in some cases entire areas have been declared closed, preventing owners from entering them.
Israeli authorities present the registration as an administrative and cadastral process. Critics, on the other hand, consider it an instrument for consolidating territorial control.
International reaction
The debate over the plan takes place in a broader context of criticism of Israeli policies in the West Bank. Palestinian and international human rights organizations have warned for years about increased settler violence and possible coordination between security forces and armed groups in some areas.
On the other hand, Israel has argued that its actions are aimed at administering the territory and ensuring security.
Analysts note that shifting the focus from direct military operations to administrative mechanisms makes escalation on the ground less visible, but does not reduce the long-term impact on the status of the territory.
The debate over land registration in the West Bank is expected to continue, while the issue of the final status of the territory remains one of the most sensitive points in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. / Adapted from "Pamphlet" by " Al Jazeera "
Lini një Përgjigje