FLASH
Shkruar nga Spartak Ngjela
Saliu exaggerates everything or minimizes everything. And the funniest thing is the argument about the Partizani issue, which is obviously sinking him...
Saliu spins around with childish lies to hide his and his family's corruption; while those who, in the guise of experts, run SPAK laugh at him and say:
How has an individual created his political popularity in Albania who, currently wanting to escape corruption charges with his pastoral level, is proving his criminal responsibility even more clearly day by day?
I don't know what to say about his commissioners who have not found any abuse in the May 2025 elections.
I don't know what to say about the money that was found on him and his family has: millions of dollars.
He doesn't know how to explain how his family got rich.
Saliu exaggerates everything or minimizes everything; and the funniest thing is the argument about the Partizani issue, which is understandably sinking him.
But scientific and level-headed investigation has a method called progressive; because the fact brings out the fact in a scientific investigation where the evidence follows one another.
And the time of the Berisha fortune seems to be on trial; but what is understood by the psyche of the defendants under this case?
They don't understand because they don't know and can't understand what evidence is in the criminal process and how its truthfulness is legally guaranteed in the function of the accusation.
All of these seem abstract to Saliu and those involved in this accusation, and this makes them happy because they are delusional in their construction and say: while this accusation seems abstract to me, it does not exist.
And therefore it seems to them that they have won the case; but of course everything will be clarified for us legally with a precise legal understanding by the legal provability of this issue during the judicial process; which has begun.
But great criminologists have told us that the accused who cannot understand the accusations brought against him in court; even though he knows like the sun that he committed the crime; falls into delusions of grandeur and from his delusions he thinks himself superior in defense, and does not even ask the lawyer.
As a rule, these have been dictators accused before a court, but also former presidents who, in their ridiculous defense before the court that is trying them, believe they have defeated the prosecution, even though in fact they have said nonsense without legal logic as a defense.
Lini një Përgjigje